<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Its here &#8211; USPV!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nigelpoulton.com/its-here-uspv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nigelpoulton.com/its-here-uspv/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>with nigel poulton</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 19:37:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nigel (mackem)</title>
		<link>http://blog.nigelpoulton.com/its-here-uspv/comment-page-1/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel (mackem)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 15:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.rupturedmonkey.com/?p=86#comment-184</guid>
		<description>karl,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;now that you mention it I see what they were trying to acheive.&#160; I guess its all down to personal preference though - I really liked the doors on the old USP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>karl,</p>
<p>now that you mention it I see what they were trying to acheive.&nbsp; I guess its all down to personal preference though &#8211; I really liked the doors on the old USP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephen2615</title>
		<link>http://blog.nigelpoulton.com/its-here-uspv/comment-page-1/#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>stephen2615</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 04:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.rupturedmonkey.com/?p=86#comment-183</guid>
		<description>I read the article about what it can do and I found the usage of the USP V to be quite fascinating.&#160; Whats it good for?&#160; High end UNIX and Mainframe systems that need performance.&#160; Does that alienate Microsoft as we all know the disks rust up when Windows has to use them.
he he he....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the article about what it can do and I found the usage of the USP V to be quite fascinating.&nbsp; Whats it good for?&nbsp; High end UNIX and Mainframe systems that need performance.&nbsp; Does that alienate Microsoft as we all know the disks rust up when Windows has to use them.<br />
he he he&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl</title>
		<link>http://blog.nigelpoulton.com/its-here-uspv/comment-page-1/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 03:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.rupturedmonkey.com/?p=86#comment-182</guid>
		<description>The skins were supposed to resemble the computer screens from the &quot;Matrix&quot; movies.&#160; In person they look much better than the pics you have but they still come up a bit short of really replicating the &quot;Matrix&quot; look (they needed more granularity).&#160; It&#039;s still a nice change from the rather bland fronts on the current USP line and the 9980&#039;s (still don&#039;t know why they dropped the &quot;checkerboard&quot; pattern from the 9980&#039;s - those were cool).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The skins were supposed to resemble the computer screens from the &quot;Matrix&quot; movies.&nbsp; In person they look much better than the pics you have but they still come up a bit short of really replicating the &quot;Matrix&quot; look (they needed more granularity).&nbsp; It&#8217;s still a nice change from the rather bland fronts on the current USP line and the 9980&#8217;s (still don&#8217;t know why they dropped the &quot;checkerboard&quot; pattern from the 9980&#8217;s &#8211; those were cool).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

